<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dating Websites, Superbowl Ads and Tim Tebow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalfish.com/TheDailyTackle/2010/02/07/dating-websites-superbowl-ads-and-tim-tebow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalfish.com/TheDailyTackle/2010/02/07/dating-websites-superbowl-ads-and-tim-tebow/</link>
	<description>Law, News, and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfish.com/TheDailyTackle/2010/02/07/dating-websites-superbowl-ads-and-tim-tebow/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfish.com/TheDailyTackle/?p=898#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think CBS is just trying to subtly push its values and opinions to the world.  They didn&#039;t have a strong enough reason why they didn&#039;t air the ManCrunch ad.  I mean, if they&#039;re willing to pay, what&#039;s the problem, right?  Meh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think CBS is just trying to subtly push its values and opinions to the world.  They didn&#8217;t have a strong enough reason why they didn&#8217;t air the ManCrunch ad.  I mean, if they&#8217;re willing to pay, what&#8217;s the problem, right?  Meh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krystyna</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfish.com/TheDailyTackle/2010/02/07/dating-websites-superbowl-ads-and-tim-tebow/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Krystyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfish.com/TheDailyTackle/?p=898#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Having now seen the Tebow ad, and knowing the CBS&#039;s stance on airing controversial ads, what do you think?  Is it a thinly veiled attempt to promote pro-life choices and restrict choice in America?  

And, in your opinion, was the Mancrunch ad (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEkcs4O5pRU) denied for being controversial since it contained sexual content or for promoting homosexual relationships?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having now seen the Tebow ad, and knowing the CBS&#8217;s stance on airing controversial ads, what do you think?  Is it a thinly veiled attempt to promote pro-life choices and restrict choice in America?  </p>
<p>And, in your opinion, was the Mancrunch ad (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEkcs4O5pRU" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEkcs4O5pRU&amp;referer=');">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEkcs4O5pRU</a>) denied for being controversial since it contained sexual content or for promoting homosexual relationships?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

